[La Flor di mi secreto]
1995 - Spain
Director
Pedro Almodovar
Starring
Marisa Paredes, Chus Lampreave, Rossy De Palma
|
The general critical line on this film seems to be that this is the film that marked his transition into ‘mature’ filmmaking — and in terms of technical perfection and greater accessibility I would agree this is of a piece with everything that comes after (the only later film I have yet to see now is Bad Education). But I don’t agree with that dismissive attitude toward his earlier work, and the ‘rules’ about technique and narrative development have never applied to Almo… well, he’s a “you get it, or you don’t” guy. Anyway, this is a rather straightforward one about a writer having a mid-life identity crisis and the dissolution of a perfectly conventional marriage. Plenty of Almodovarian touches, some delightful foreshadowing of All About My Mother and Volver, and brief respites of giddy humor (Chus calling Rossy “crabface” = best thing ever), but this is one of his more serious — certainly, “mature” — efforts.
|
Screencaps
[La Comunidad]
2000 - Spain
Director
Alex de la Iglesia
Starring
Carmen Maura
|
Giddily demented, cartoonishly horrific little gem about an apartment complex full of people who have been waiting twenty years for the lottery winner on the 5th floor to die, and are willing to kill when a new arrival gets to the money first. Shades of Polanski’s The Tenant to be sure, and it partakes of the usual visual and musical cues of the horror genre; while it may not subvert or reinvent anything, it certainly explodes conventions in delightful ways. And my juvenile fixations aside, there really is nothing like putting a Grande Dame of cinema in a film like this. Every great actress should have one. Joan and Bette had Baby Jane; Gena recently had Skeleton Key. Here’s another for that pantheon: Carmen Maura as action star? as slasher flick survivor? All that and more… Wickedly fun & highly recommended.
|
Screencaps
“You are more authentic the more you resemble what you’ve dreamed of being.”
[Todo sobre mi madre]
1999 - Spain
Director
Pedro Almodovar
Starring
Marisa Paredes, Penelope Cruz
|
To Bette Davis, Gena Rowlands, Romy Schneider…To all actresses who have played actresses, to all women who act, to men who act and become women, to all people who want to become mothers. To my mother.
-Pedro’s dedication
I’m really at a loss for (coherent) words following this one, so I will only say that it was a slow-building, intensely emotional experience for me, and left me in unexpected tears. I don’t want to speak of it critically or comparatively right now, but his entire body of work — so sympathetically, deliriously fixated on women, mothers, relationships between women, women as seen by society and men, and above all The Feminine — has given me so much in so brief a time… His characters — broad caricatures, really, filled to the brim with sincere, precise detail — have become part of me. His narratives — always twisting, always shifting, mutating almost to the point of absurdist pastiche, then reigned in again masterfully — find their way into my own. He captures through cinema something of my life, something I have a rare affinity for. There are only four or five other guys I can say this about… and what else can I say? , , .
|
1986 - Spain
Director
Pedro Almodovar
Starring
Carmen Maura, Antonio Banderas, Eusebio Poncela, Julieta Serrano, Chus Lampreave
|
Had to happen sooner or later: here is the first Almodóvar I didn’t entirely love. It crosses that fun-to-flirt-with line between lovably wild and actually unpleasant, framing violence and sex as bleakly and viciously as in Haneke — with, admittedly, much more visual panache. Another first: never has sex in an Almodóvar been so unsexy. Perhaps this one proves his “range.”
Anyway: in this film he conflates the violence of a bullfight with the violence of sex with the violence of something inherent in Spanish culture — again, in a Hanekean sense this is an interesting statement, but his characters (ordinarily so richly drawn!) are simple and baffling, and as in Law of Desire they are reduced to instinct, but perhaps instincts I cannot penetrate. Banderas’ vertigo gives way to telepathy in a truly silly finish — of course I have enjoyed my Almodóvar truly silly, but this one didn’t entirely work for me. Still, there really is a lot of visual bravura in this film, and anything with supporting roles for Carmen, Julieta and Chus is going to be plenty fun.
—————————-
Added, 17 June 2007:
I’m thinking of amending my review, though. In a way Matador is masterful because I don’t think he’s trying to make a “statement,” as I said. Those two characters belong to an extreme sadomasochist sexual subculture, and it’s impressive (in a way!) how he presents it without judgment. I also don’t think the film is meant to shock the viewer into a new awareness about some topical issue — as Haneke does. So in the end, I would agree that it is still a very good film, but I would also agree that I may never want to see it again because — yes, it is still very unpleasant to watch!!
|
Screencaps

[La Ley del deseo]
1987 - Spain
Director
Pedro Almodovar
Starring
Carmen Maura, Eusebio Poncela, Antonio Banderas
|
If it had been easier to coordinate, I would have loved to watch Almodóvar’s films in chronological order. From my cherry-picking vantage point, it seems he began to turn a corner somewhere around this film and Women on the Verge…, both films serving as gradients in his progression from his early aggressive, exaggerated work to his later sophisticated, perfectly scripted films. These two seem to embody the very best of both worlds, and are likely to emerge as my very favorites once I’ve finished his CV.
This one really is a punch in the stomach. He starts off simply with a few interesting, but evidently fairly normal characters: a film director, who we learn is gay; an actress who is ridiculed by the press, for reasons not yet known; a viewer who leaves a screening to jerk off in the bathroom. From such ordinary beginnings and realistic relationships, Almodóvar twists the thing and twists it and twists it, turning his characters into ever more monstrous and yet believable, understandable creatures, zinging his narrative through unexpected rages, confessions, and instinctive lunges for what must seem to them the very thing they need to survive. It’s a hell of a ride to behold, but not for a moment is it forced. I won’t spoil a single detail about these characters: there is too much joy in the discovery!
|
Screencaps

[Divorzio all'italiana]
1961 - Italy
Director
Pietro Germi
Starring
Marcello Mastroianni, Stefania Sandrelli
|
Uproariously funny, whether you prefer to see a straightforward, definitively Italian comedy or a wickedly honest, political/pre-feminist satire. Pietro treats all variety of people in this small Sicilian town — from the nominal nobility to harridan wives, starving artists, peasants, lawmakers — with a degree of understanding and respect on the one hand, and farcical exaggeration on the other, at all times. Mastroianni is, well, exactly as perfect as we all expect him to be as the slimy, sad, somehow still-lovable Ferdinando, and Germi’s detailed, rich, and varied choices in presentation are continually surprising and universally effective.
|
1998 - France/Spain
Director
André Téchiné
Starring
Carmen Maura, Mathieu Amalric, Juliette Binoche
|
Téchiné, sadly, has never worked for me. He’s made so many films, and has a high enough reputation, that I’m almost convinced these sins (against my viewing pleasure) are intentional: a) characters whose actions make no sense whatsoever — in fact, whose actions directly contradict what sense one has been able to make of them, and not in psycholgically revealing ways; b) time jumps ahead several weeks or months without warning, clues or reason; again, this doesn’t seem to be toward any purpose like narrative deconstruction; he just suddenly drops a thread and picks it up again, one supposes, at the next point at which it interests him. The way I’m putting it, it almost sounds like he’s making interesting formal choices, but truly, of the three lackluster films I have seen from him so far this is the least crafted and compelling by far.
|
1999 - Argentina/Spain
Director
Antonio Hernandez
Starring
Carmen Maura
|
Another rather silly Maura vehicle, but held my attention with significantly more success. It’s your average chase thriller, complete with the obligatory sex-in-car scene 2/3 through. I was wondering if the DVD blurbs are designed to be in balance with the actual quality of the films they describe… from “Berta is sexy, mysterious, and possibly insane” I knew this would be awesomely bad. But possibly insane? She’s treated as fundamentally credible from the start, yet our hero doesn’t get it until he hears the story from a third party, and I think this is meant to be a revealing moment for the audience, too. “That sensible man just confirmed everything that crazy lady said!” Actually there are a variety of things in this film I could probably take offense to, but it’s fluff. I really need to get back into the habit of watching good movies.
|
Entre tinieblas
1982 - Spain
Director
Pedro Almodovar
Starring
Julieta Serrano, Marisa Paredes, Carmen Maura, Chus Lampreave
|
This is bitchy, hilarious, and ultimately nearly brought me to tears — who can do all these things as well as Almodovar? His nuns are hardcore drug addicts, tiger tamers and romance novelists; at the film’s core (Julieta Serrano rightfully owns this movie), his Mother Superior admires and wants to be one of her troubled girls, and seethes with barely restrained lesbian desire. In Almodovar’s hands, Catholic satire is wilder than most but far from shrill — above all, it is purely enjoyable.
I’ll be honest, though: I love this movie because I’m in the mood to love this movie. It is not Almo’s most successful narrative. I would probably recommend it to few…
|
Screencaps


2007 - US
Director
Adrienne Shelly
Starring
Keri Russell, Nathan Fillion, Cheryl Hines, Jeremy Sisto, Andy Griffith, Adrienne Shelly
|
Ahh, I’ve gotten ahead of myself. I saw this before Johnny Guitar, but wonderful as this was, JG distracted me from it and then some. But Waitress, Waitress… let me try to recall how I loved it.
This is the sort of film that enraptures the willing viewer in its unique spirit. It’s only afterward that one realizes hey, the narrative was pretty straightforward and at times trite — and for that matter, some of the characters were easy stereotypes. Somehow this doesn’t really hurt the film, as the characters are fleshed out by wonderfully three-dimensional performances and fresh, offbeat dialogue. Shelly has a sense of humor unlike anyone’s — wicked, silly, but surprisingly subtle at times. In the end, Waitress feels completely fresh and is enormously successful in evoking both laughter and heartbreak. It’s a shame there’ll be no more like this, following Shelly’s death… I fully expect this to be on my top 10 at the end of the year.
|
|
About TLC
Films: All reviewed | Favorites
Actors: Profiles | Favorites
Directors: Profiles | Favorites
Screencap galleries
All films by year
2008 Viewing log
Waterloo Bridge 1931, James Whale
Red-Headed Woman 1932, Jack Conway
Millie 1931, John Francis Dillon
The Woman Accused 1933, Paul Sloane
So Big! 1932, William A Wellman
The Awful Truth 1937, Leo McCarey
Conquest 1937, Clarence Brown
It’s Love I’m After 1937, Archie Mayo
The Mad Miss Manton 1938, Leigh Jason
Algiers 1938, John Cromwell
A short digression on Charles Boyer…
Yes, I am endeared. I am, in fact, ensorceled. His inhumanly arched eyebrows, his little winks and half-smiles, and that ability to at once maintain full control of his material while shining the spotlight on his costar: yes, that is talent; yes, this is love. And no, Cluny Brown, it’s not just the cocktails giving you that persian cat feeling… I think we both know too well it has a bit to do with Mr Charles Boyer. Rawr.
Pre-Code Hollywood
» Waterloo Bridge 1931 James Whale
» Red-Headed Woman 1932 Jack Conway
» Millie 1931 John Francis Dillon
» The Woman Accused 1933 Paul Sloane
» So Big! 1932 William A Wellman
Previous & ongoing
30s Cinema
Maestresses
The Lubitsch Race
In-transit romances
Nothing better suited to Hollywood romance than three weeks out of time, away from life, falling in love with a stranger, spending days idly and nights actively.
Currently reading
On the shelf
| |
Allure
Awards Daily
Bright Lights Film Journal
Cinemaniacal
Cinema Talk
Classic Cinema Online
Collective Contemplations on Cinema
Critical Culture
Criticker
Fataculture
Film Comment
Film Int
Greenbriar Picture Shows
House of Mirth & Movies
If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger...
Jump Cut
Mango Grove
Not Coming to a Theater Near You
The Pagan Agenda
Pop Matters
Rants & Musings
Reverse Shot
Self-Styled Siren
Senses of Cinema
Shining a Light on the Forgotten Classics
Sight & Sound
Sin in Soft Focus
TCM schedule
They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?
Through a Blog Darkly
Friend me
|