This is an interesting film, but only in incidental respects; you can see easily enough I don’t much esteem it. The film appears to be well-regarded among reviewers who have not seen, or lamentably, even heard of Duvivier’s Pepe le Moko, and I suppose if you are categorically against foreign cinema you could watch this and see in it a fine film. This is not just a remake (Hollywood churned out countless such things right from its beginnings, and recognizing this it’s hard to demonize them across the board as many do today; it’s in the nature of this beast to cannibalize itself, too) — it is an obsessively constructed duplicate down to the smallest detail. Actors were cast to closely resemble the original players; decors were recreated to match exactly; shots and lighting were studied and emulated. Worse, producers attempted to destroy all copies of Pepe, while directly lifting much of its footage and score and (is it necessary to mention it at this point?) failing to give it formal credit. When I call this film interesting, I mean that it is one of the most crass examples of Hollywood arrogance and I can’t help but admire its sheer perversity.
For all this, the film doesn’t come close to duplicating Pepe’s visual and emotional impact. Besides being put off by something innately monstrous about it, it feels sluggish in translation, perhaps showing signs of over-work and calculation. John Cromwell is a solid director but no inspired artist and the whole thing just feels clumsy. It doesn’t even have the energy to come across as camp, a level on which some viewers do appreciate it, although there are a few unintentionally hilarious bits in the strained melodrama that bring some relief. And after this overlong practical joke, it has the gall to change one thing: Pepe’s ultimate fate, and if this doesn’t undermine his whole character then it certainly says less about it. If I hadn’t already been laughing so hard at Boyer’s bellowed “Gabeee!”s, I’d have cried.
But Charles. Oh, Charlie. Charlie is of course the other interesting thing about Algiers, and after giving up what little hope I began with that it might be a decent film in its own right I placed all my pleasure in his sure hands. This is always a safe bet, and why he’s gradually become one of those guys I’d watch in anything. It’s hard to edge this out over recent swoon-fest All This, & Heaven Too or anything he ever did with darling Irene, but this might just be his all-around sexiest role. Urbane-smooth Boyer is not a natural gangster type and lacks Gabin’s more obvious edge, but he gives the role his all and finds an unexpected roughness and swagger, making his gentler love scenes and (yes!) outbursts of song all the more potent in contrast. Perhaps the manifestation of a sort of Napoleon complex, Boyer’s Pepe is surprisingly violent, and I (surprisingly?) delighted in watching him thrash women around. (My feminism is selective.) Oh yes, there are many things to enjoy in this film, if one only knows where to direct one’s attention. Yes, Boyer “interests” me!
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
|
About TLC
Films: All reviewed | Favorites
Actors: Profiles | Favorites
Directors: Profiles | Favorites
All films by year
2008 Viewing log
The Woman Accused 1933, Paul Sloane
So Big! 1932, William A Wellman
The Awful Truth 1937, Leo McCarey
Conquest 1937, Clarence Brown
It’s Love I’m After 1937, Archie Mayo
The Mad Miss Manton 1938, Leigh Jason
Algiers 1938, John Cromwell
The Gay Divorcee 1934, Mark Sandrich
All This, & Heaven Too 1940, Anatole Litvak
Mannequin 1937, Frank Borzage
A short digression on Charles Boyer…
Yes, I am endeared. I am, in fact, ensorceled. His inhumanly arched eyebrows, his little winks and half-smiles, and that ability to at once maintain full control of his material while shining the spotlight on his costar: yes, that is talent; yes, this is love. And no, Cluny Brown, it’s not just the cocktails giving you that persian cat feeling… I think we both know too well it has a bit to do with Mr Charles Boyer. Rawr.
Pre-Code Hollywood
» The Woman Accused 1933 Paul Sloane
» So Big! 1932 William A Wellman
» Pre-Code Icons Gallery #1: Barbara Stanwyck
» A Month of Pre-Code Hollywood
Previous months
30s Cinema
Maestresses
The Lubitsch Race
In-transit romances
Nothing better suited to Hollywood romance than three weeks out of time, away from life, falling in love with a stranger, spending days idly and nights actively.
Allure
Awards Daily
Bright Lights Film Journal
Cinemaniacal
Cinema Talk
Classic Cinema Online
Collective Contemplations on Cinema
Critical Culture
Criticker
Fataculture
Film Comment
Film Int
Greenbriar Picture Shows
House of Mirth & Movies
If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger...
Jump Cut
Mango Grove
Not Coming to a Theater Near You
The Pagan Agenda
Pop Matters
Rants & Musings
Reverse Shot
Self-Styled Siren
Senses of Cinema
Sight & Sound
TCM schedule
They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?
Through a Blog Darkly
Friend me
|
Another dissapointment
I have this on my hard drive still though, I’ll get back to you with proper comments. It does seem many who do champion this film do ignore the presence of Pepe le Moko (which we’ll agree is wonderful). I love the cast though, at least it’ll deliver in that aspect (I hope).
Comment by Justine — 11 April 2008 @ 11 April 2008