Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles

Posted 17 January 2008 in Screening log

Rating 1975 Belgium / France Dir Chantal Akerman Cast   Delphine Seyrig, Jan Decort IMDb

Staggering. As anticipated, one of those films that’s difficult to recover from. The kind that won’t let your heart stop racing, won’t let your mind turn to any other subject, won’t let you go on about a normal day — particularly so in this case because to go on about a normal day, to do the dishes or the laundry, would be now too psychotically tied up in Jeanne Dielman’s own rigorously performed daily tasks; I might begin to wonder if I too am losing my stable shell of self while fetching the mail, might act out in a frightfully perverse show of agency while preparing my lunch.

This is the masterpiece many say it is, of filmic technique and feminist critique, and any who suspect they might be bored by watching a half-silent film about a woman mostly doing housework should just skip it, and not taint my new love. The film demands a lot and from a captive viewer; you must decide within ten minutes whether this is a woman you could care about, invest yourself in, even if you are given little of the usual expositional reasons to. When Jeanne flits from one chore to the next, switches off a light or closes a door, stares into space or silently at her son, it will not do to merely watch her; then, yes, for three hours you may be bored. You must inhabit her space, see with her eyes, think what thoughts must lurk behind that perfectly impassive gaze… It is, actually, riveting.

Jeanne is not living, not at any level beyond basic routine, and she falters when the smallest detail of her perpetually lived day is found amiss; these rituals are clearly an expression of love for her son, and his newly voiced horror at the realization that his mother has ever been ‘violently penetrated’ is an expression of love for her, but they cannot connect; never once, I don’t think, do two characters make eye contact in this film; once in a while they look at one another, but they never do connect. In the final minutes the viewer is let in on what happens when Jeanne leads her afternoon company into her bedroom, and what that act has perhaps always done to her usual emotional stasis, but this time — perhaps at random, perhaps in a culmination of years like this — she acts.

Akerman’s uncompromisingly rigid structure and social commentary lay the necessary foundation. Seyrig, in a heartrending performance felt in every extremity of her body, makes it work.

 

2 Comments »

I really should see this. It’s been in my pile of things to watch for the longest time now. Same goes for all the other Akerman films I have. Perhaps she’s not Asian enough?

In any case, nice review! The film seems like you.

Comment by Jake Savage — 20 January 2008 @ 20 January 2008

Oh no, your comments go to my spam folder for some reason instead of being automatically approved! I almost lost the comment — hope I haven’t accidentally deleted any others.

Yeah, Dielman is pretty much a film custom-made for me. :) I think you’d like it too, when you’re in the mood for something 3 hours long and Belgian; certainly this is a true-to-life if impenetrable character, and the technical rigor people go gaga for should be right up your alley. I won’t go out on a limb and predict you’d love it, but some of the right pieces are in place.

Comment by Lauren — 20 January 2008 @ 20 January 2008

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


about
Lauren, 25, out-of-work librarian. At the moment, TLC is but a review blog and catalogue of my film-related perversions. I always plan to do more with it — and to one day step outside 30s Hollywood again. Who knows?


navigation
Films: All reviewed | Favorites
Actors: Profiles | Favorites
Directors: Profiles | Favorites
Screencap galleries
All films by year
2008 Viewing log


Screening Log
» The Great Lie 1941, Edmund Goulding
» In This Our Life 1942, John Huston
» The Crash 1932, William Dieterle
» CafĂ© Metropole 1937, Edward H Griffith
» Dodsworth 1936, William Wyler
» The Rich Are Always with Us 1932, Alfred E Green
» Lilly Turner 1933, William A Wellman
» Frisco Jenny 1932, William A Wellman
» Female 1933, Michael Curtiz
» Waterloo Bridge 1931, James Whale

Feedback
The Great Lie (2)
  • Lauren: Au contraire, I love the idea of the potentials of artlessness. …And wish I had somewhere to go with...
  • Mango: Wonderful, an update. Cool spoiler device. It sounds like this strikes on the wonderful potentials artlessness...
In This Our Life (1)
  • John McElwee: I’ve just discovered you, spent the last hour reading “The Life Cinematic”, and let...
Dodsworth (2)
  • Lauren: He’s the guy on the ship early in the film who first tries to seduce Mrs Dodsworth. Too bad they...
  • Mango: David Niven is in Dodsworth? I don’t remember him…

The Bookshelf
Currently reading
On the shelf
» Film library
» Complete library

links
» Allure
» Awards Daily
» Bright Lights Film Journal
» Cinemaniacal
» Cinemascope
» Cinema Talk
» Classic Cinema Online
» Collective Contemplations on Cinema
» Critical Culture
» Criticker
» Fataculture
» Film Comment
» Film Int
» Greenbriar Picture Shows
» House of Mirth & Movies
» If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger...
» Jump Cut
» Mango Grove
» Not Coming to a Theater Near You
» The Pagan Agenda
» Pop Matters
» Rants & Musings
» Reverse Shot
» Self-Styled Siren
» Senses of Cinema
» Shining a Light on the Forgotten Classics
» Sight & Sound
» Sin in Soft Focus
» TCM schedule
» They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?
» Through a Blog Darkly

Netflix
The Night of the Iguana Reflections in a Golden Eye The Asphalt Jungle Under the Volcano Lifeboat The Most Dangerous Game The Good Fairy Persepolis 

Friend me