The More the Merrier
Posted March 8, 2009 with 5 comments

1943 US Dir George Stevens Cast Jean Arthur, Joel McCrea, Charles Coburn IMDb

A superlative romantic comedy, although Stevens’ entries in the genre lack the speed and sass of his best contemporaries. His films make it up with thoughtfulness and sensitivity: punctuated by outbursts of zaniness, carried along by pleasant vibes of charm and sweetness, they are basically earnest affairs. Frank Capra, plainly, has more edge. At the same time, they never drift into meaningless sentiment or crass manipulation, regardless of the material (and consider how easy it would have been with something like the laughable-on-paper, much-afflicted lovers of Penny Serenade) — Stevens’ films are above all grounded in moments of refreshing human intimacy.

Merrier’s plot speaks to both the time and a screwball sensibility: in a small gesture of patriotism, amidst war and a housing shortage, kind and orderly Jean Arthur offers half her apartment for rent, and is soon burdened with cunning and pushy Charles Coburn, who like any good opportunist quickly rents half of his half to handsome and taciturn Joel McCrea. Yes, there are outbursts of zaniness: Arthur’s attempt to strictly regulate their morning routine quickly turns into a well-choreographed slapstick interlude; McCrea first lets down his solemn demeanor by barking like a seal in the shower. And charm and sweetness it has in profusion: how could it help but, with Jean Arthur rumba-ing about the frame? Oh, it’s all absolutely irresistible, of course.

But it’s those intimate moments that make it something really special, too: of course Arthur and McCrea will resolve their roommate squabbles, little misunderstandings, and the matter of her awfully practical fiance. If you love these movies, you don’t mind the formula, and you will cling to every little variation on the theme just to feel time and again as if this were the first couple you ever girlishly rooted for. Of course these things will happen, and you will engage the film as, predictably, they do. But these things don’t always — or, in fact, at all often — happen with such an overwhelming sense of natural urgency. Women are not always as unassumingly ensorceling as Jean Arthur is here. Men are not always turned into helpless zombies by sheer lust as is Joel McCrea. I could never adequately describe the genuine intimacy and real connection and sheer yearning (oh, what in the world is there to top sheer yearning?) of the two sequences that really sell this romance: first, unable to keep their eyes off one another, they are drawn together in the rumba they had shared previously only rooms apart; then, unable to keep their hands off one another, they walk home together and barely resist consummation there on the brownstone steps. Then the embarrassment of realizing they are still roommates; then the unguarded exchange of confidences through thin bedroom walls.

The film is full of such lovely (and quite racy) moments. It avoids the easy happily-ever-after; it never goes to cheap cynicism. Perhaps it is of its time and of its ilk and nothing more — if George Stevens is great at what he does, he’s still no master — but all the same, this is what a film looks like when it strikes a perfect balance.

 

5 Comments »

I love Coburn in this. Even more than the other two stars, who I chase after.

Comment by Mango — 8 March 2009 @ 8 March 2009

Wow, that’s a strong statement. He’s wonderful in this. After seeing him incidentally in several 40s comedies I watched for other people, I would definitely seek out a film just because he was in it now.

The revelation for me, though, was McCrea, whom I always found likable but never anywhere near as appealing as here. Perhaps I hadn’t noticed his charms because there was always a Stanwyck or Dunne or Sturges script to steal my attention. I must see more McCrea films, tonight perhaps rewatching Manhattan and Palm Beach before bed — what else do you recommend? So I should do a whole Sturges thing, too.

Comment by Lauren — 8 March 2009 @ 8 March 2009

If you are looking for McCrea sex, Palm Beach is the way to go. He has some lusty pre-codes which are amusing. Hmm… oh, and also These Three. I am surprised he has appealed to you. He is certainly not the contintental romantic you would swoon over. I think he has an oddly wide romantic range, though. You’ll see what I mean if you further sample his filmography.

Comment by Mango — 8 March 2009 @ 8 March 2009

Oh, I was trying to find These Three a while back — I see it has made it to KG since I last looked. That’s top priority. Wyler (and the story) interest me too.

Yes McCrea is not my natural type. And I am not certain yet that it will go much further than the immensely pleasing handsiness of Merrier. I also recognize that the whole thing is being fed by a dream I had last night: in my dream I was in love with someone, but I awoke unable to remember any details about the man, only remembered the way the dream made me feel, so then I go off and watch Handsy McCrea and it seems the dream man has taken on his face and so the feeling lingers — and why not, if I have such a susceptible and gratifying mind? ;)

This is the greatest article. http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/50/mccrea.htm

Comment by Lauren — 8 March 2009 @ 8 March 2009

“This is the greatest article.”
I didn’t believe this, but having read it…
I think I’ll go watch The Palm Beach Story.

Comment by Mango — 8 March 2009 @ 8 March 2009

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)